O
Stow
← Community
ZoningCommunity discussion

Multifamily density cap

Stow

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (7)Opposed (4)

At a glance

Public comments
11
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Mar 24, 2026.

Public comments (6)

OpposedDave BaumgartnerMar 24, 2026

Read an email opposing removal of the density cap, citing the December 4 council vote, a 29% rental rate with 9.8% vacancy, comparisons to Kent and Cuyahoga Falls, and crime/property-value concerns.

Planning Commission (Regular) - Mar 24, 2026 · 30:22 →
OpposedBob NeiderMar 24, 2026

Agreed with the prior speaker, citing infrastructure strains and school impacts, and said Stow should favor single-family dwellings.

Planning Commission (Regular) - Mar 24, 2026 · 34:50 →
SupportiveJames JagerMar 24, 2026

Local home builder and developer said his modern multifamily projects have benefited the city, disputed the vacancy figures, and argued the town needs modern rules that allow growth.

Planning Commission (Regular) - Mar 24, 2026 · 35:59 →
SupportiveAngie CharlesMar 24, 2026

Landlord from a Cuyahoga Falls landlord family; said apartments are vital for young people starting out and objected to treating renters as unwelcome.

Planning Commission (Regular) - Mar 24, 2026 · 39:38 →
SupportiveGuy HermanMar 24, 2026

Steering committee member argued the December vote reflected misunderstandings, cited the comprehensive plan and 2022 diagnostic report, and said housing scarcity inflates property values and taxes.

Planning Commission (Regular) - Mar 24, 2026 · 41:01 →
SupportiveKim YoungMar 24, 2026

Council member said door-knocking during her campaign showed residents want the plan, and that the December amendments appeared rushed and confused, negating two years of work.

Planning Commission (Regular) - Mar 24, 2026 · 45:44 →